Writing
Articles, essays, longer-form thoughts, spanning whatever discipline the subject happens to belong to.
-
The false balance
The great injustices of history were almost all legal: statutes, clerks, stamps in the right places, administered by orderly people who slept well. Systems like that need more than greed or hatred; they need a principle that makes injustice look like justice from the inside, and the principle is idolatry. An idol is a finite good made ultimate, and the ultimate thing sets the exchange rate on persons, so the scale is tilted before any weighing begins: honest judges reading a dishonest scale. On why the machinery of justice survives while the standard is captured (Isaiah's iniquitous decrees, Amos's righteous sold for silver in the gate, mint and cumin tithed while justice is omitted), the doctrine of deserving every idol generates to keep its victims guilty, and the crisis move that completes the pattern: scapegoating the innocent, chosen for eligibility rather than guilt (Girard's persecutors writing the record, Naboth's vineyard taken by lawful witnesses, Caiaphas's expedient that one man should die, and the cross as the mechanism unmasked). Then the three diagnostic questions (who pays, what may not be questioned, can the system convict itself), why justice needs a standard no system owns, the reformer's trap of the cause sliding into the ultimate slot, and the small courts we each convene at home and at work. A false balance condemns the weights, not the weighing.
-
Stillness is power
We picture power as motion, but reactivity is remote control: whoever can provoke you has hired your whole engine at a wage of nothing, and he who rules his spirit outranks he who takes a city. On the mechanics of the claim (everything that moves is moved around something still: the hinge, the axle, the eye of the storm), the still mind as the only instrument that measures accurately (muddy water clearing, Pascal's quiet room, Marcus Aurelius's citadel), quietness as military strategy in the scriptures (Isaiah's in quietness and in trust shall be your strength, the LORD not in the wind or earthquake or fire but in a low whisper, Christ asleep in the storm and silent before Pilate), and why stillness is not passivity but uncoerced action. Then the turn the strong most need: the citadel is rented, creaturely stillness is contingent and prone to becoming an idol of self-mastery, and the chain of still points does not ground out in you. Psalm 46:10 does not say be still and become power. Be still, and know that I am God.
-
Keeping appetite small
Sufficiency is a fraction (means over wants), and we spend whole lives working the numerator while treating the denominator as weather. It isn't: appetite is a trainable variable that grows by exactly what it is fed. On the eye as a comparator that resets on every delivery (Sheol and the eyes of man, the hedonic treadmill), Seneca and Epicurus's line between desires with a ceiling and desires with only a horizon, how an appetite is enlarged ring by ring like the wood in The shape of a tree (each feeding deniable, hearts trained in greed, a can't assembled out of won'ts, argument and windfalls both failing for the same reason), why the grown appetite reads as desperate and repellent from outside (dependence become legible, need without proportion, the belly promoted to god), the scriptures' prescription of a ration rather than a barn (manna that rots overnight, daily bread, give me neither poverty nor riches), contentment as a learned skill rather than a temperament (fasting and gratitude as the training modules, advertising as the opposing industry), why a small appetite is not small ambition but the war chest that funds large aims, and the one hunger the tradition promises to satisfy. You are as rich as what you no longer need.
-
The shape of a tree
The question that consumes decades near a destructive person: can't he, or won't he? The question is malformed, and a tree shows why. Character is laid down like rings of wood: each refusal to trace a bad feeling to its own cause is a real choice at the time and structural afterward, until a can't stands assembled entirely out of won'ts. On why argument fails (the transmission is fine; the receiver was never built), the darker symmetry of a man specialised for blame the way an organism is specialised for a niche, why crisis and even mortal threat fail too (storms break mature trees or they don't; they never reshape them), the strange release in learning there was no chance, and deciding where to stand instead of arguing with the shape. Closes with the gospels' own tree imagery: the fruit, the barren fig tree, and the vine branch gathered for the one use left to wood that will not bear.
-
Needless vigilance is needless cost
Vigilance is a cost levied continuously, even on days nothing goes wrong: a hostile junction taxes every crossing, the safe ones included, because the price is not the accident but the attention. Opening with a near-miss at a blind corner in the City of London that charged for the crossing despite touching nothing: on the invisible tax a house, a debt, a suburban walk each levy (invisible because the compensation works), the line between bought vigilance (attention exchanged for risks chosen for good reasons) and needless vigilance, alertness that buys nothing because the danger could be designed out, routed around, or never signed up for; Martha and Mary read as death by a thousand small claims; the audit that beats the discipline, since willpower is a payment plan and design is paying it off; and why, if your work runs on attention, needless vigilance is a levy on the asset that generates everything else. A companion to Know your project.
-
The gift test
We measure freedom by what we can acquire and keep. Measure it instead by what you can give away, because the gift is the one act that cannot be performed unfree. The Greeks and Romans named generosity after freedom (eleutheriotēs, liberalitas): a slave can hand over and a merchant can exchange, but only the free can give. On how whatever you cannot gift owns you (the rich young ruler, the miser on the hoard's payroll), why most giving is exchange in costume and the open ledger is the tell, the widow's two coins outscoring fortunes because the correlation is with grip rather than means, the gifts harder than money (time, attention, credit, the last word, the grievance, with forgiveness as gifting away a debt), why the person who can't receive is exactly as unfree as the one who can't give, and how giving doesn't just prove freedom but produces it. You are as free as what you can give.
-
Neither violence nor appeasement
When wronged, we think the menu has two items: hit back or give way. Both were written by the aggressor. Violence isn't the answer (it accepts his grammar and remakes you in his image), but neither is appeasement, which is not a purchase of peace but a subscription to aggression, with the premiums rising on every instalment. On rashness and cowardice as the two vices flanking courage, the Danegeld and Douglass's law of submission, the peacemaker against the peacekeeper, turning the other cheek read standing up (defiance, not submission), why strength is what makes gentleness possible, why the third way actually works (starving the story, withdrawing the borrowed hands, dividing the conscience), why aggression left unfed consumes itself, sheep among wolves (wise as serpents, innocent as doves), and the closing turn: the strength for the harder path comes not from effort but from being loved first, the rest downstream.
-
Know your project
We think hard decisions are hard because the options are close. They're hard because we never named what we're choosing for. Name your project (your vocation, the real thing your one life is organised to do) and the question doesn't get answered so much as dissolved, because you finally have a test to run every option against. On indecision as an unclear-criteria problem rather than a shortage of data, telling load-bearing wants from borrowed scripts, optimising for the ordinary Tuesday over the first-day shine, and why the bottomless project of building the self is a house on sand, while meaning is built, slowly, by whoever founds a life on a calling and stays to tend it.
-
Education through the posture of discovery
For most of the modern era, education has been front-loaded: cram knowledge in young, then spend it across a career. AI ends that bargain. Why the old model made sense, what AI actually changes when knowledge goes on tap, how learning shifts to discovery (just-in-time, lifelong, organised around questions rather than storage), what becomes scarce (good questions, judgment), and the foundation discovery still needs.
-
Boundaries without judgment
Judging others and protecting yourself look alike from the outside and are opposites underneath. On the courtroom we silently convene when we pass a verdict on a soul, judgment as playing God and the subtlest idolatry of self, how to notice the court in session and adjourn it, why a boundary around one's own soul (perhaps the only thing in our direct control) needs no defence (don't JADE), and why even that protection runs only to the level grace permits.
-
Surviving our own choices & unexamined idols
Why we defend the big structures of our lives so fiercely: not because we examined and chose them, but because they quietly became load-bearing. On unexamined idolatry (asking a finite thing to do an infinite thing's work), what an idol really is, and how to live gently alongside it.
-
The dissolution of shared identity
How the big frameworks that once told people who they were (nation, church, class, place and a common media) have weakened in modern times: the numbers behind the decline, the thinkers who named it, what rushed into the gap, and what we gain and lose as identity becomes something we assemble for ourselves.
-
Anti-racism law, the Nowak case, and Reform
Which anti-racism laws the UK actually has, how their application drifted into the “two-tier policing” row after the murder of Henry Nowak, and why, for better or worse, it helps position Reform for the next election.